CCTV can be an invaluable tool for salon owners. The footage might capture incidents involving clients and staff, or help resolve complaints, it might help identify thefts, it can enhance security and prevent incidents occurring. The situation becomes much more complicated if the employer wishes to secretly monitor employees on CCTV.
Normally it's a legal requirement for the employee to know they are being monitored in advance and the reason for it.
In this feature I will focus on CCTV monitoring; however, monitoring can also include bag searches, monitoring emails/internet activity etc. To begin with you should ensure you have a clause in your contracts allowing such monitoring and a right to search employees.
Thefts can occur in any business; it is disturbing when the culprit is an employee.
Sometimes just an announcement to staff that products/money or something else has gone missing is sufficient for the thefts to stop. The employer might give the message that if there is another theft then the police will be called. Another option is to interview all the staff to determine what, if anything, they know or suspect, this can be very informative. This might work although it may not enable the employer to find out who the thief was.
In some circumstances the salon owner might decide that products or notes be “marked” and as soon as something goes missing there is a random bag search. If this works, and the thief is identified, then great news. You follow your disciplinary procedure, suspend and dismiss the employee.
But what if you don’t find the culprit and the thefts continue?
In exceptional circumstances the employer might decide secret monitoring is the only option. It’s clearly a tough decision for the salon owner. If they tell staff they have discovered thefts and cameras are being installed then their cover is blown. If they don't tell the staff they may uncover the thefts only to be challenged about the secret monitoring.
There isn't a right answer and there are many factors to consider. It often depends on the owner’s personal viewpoint; how much do they want to catch and dismiss the thief.
A recent case suggested that secret monitoring might be acceptable if:
A question might be-how many employees caught on camera stealing would then make a claim against the employee for secretly monitoring them? You might imagine not many. Nevertheless, it only takes one to cause the employer potential serious embarrassment and a lot of work. Hence an awareness of the risks is key.
In simple terms an employee could claim:
Every case may differ; the following are basic principles for consideration: